Friday, October 17, 2025

Understanding MARCH - The Importance of Airway Management


Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

From the MARCH Mnemonic Series – Tactical Trauma Care for EMS Providers

Following the control of massive hemorrhage, the next lifesaving priority in the MARCH algorithm is Airway. Without a patent airway, oxygen cannot reach the lungs, and death from hypoxia can occur within minutes. 

While exsanguination kills fastest, airway obstruction follows closely - especially in cases of head or neck trauma, decreased consciousness, or maxillofacial injury.

In tactical environments, airway management must be both rapid and situationally appropriate. Providers balance lifesaving intervention with operational safety - sometimes working under fire or in low-light, resource-limited conditions. 

This article - the second in a five-part series - will focus on that next critical step: 

A – Airway Management

A patent airway is one that is open and unobstructed, allowing air to move freely in and out of the lungs. Even a partial obstruction can reduce oxygen delivery and lead to hypoxia, brain injury, or cardiac arrest. 

According to the National Safety Council (2023), foreign-body airway obstruction remains the fourth leading cause of unintentional death in the United States - emphasizing the universal need for early recognition and decisive management.


Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

Principles of Airway Management

1. Assess the Airway Early

Assessment begins with observing the casualty’s level of consciousness, respiratory effort, and ability to speak or make sounds. 

The simple question, “Can the patient talk?” remains one of the fastest airway assessments available. 

Look and listen for:

  • Gurgling, snoring, or stridor
  • Facial or neck trauma
  • Blood, vomitus, or foreign bodies in the mouth
  • Absent or inadequate respiratory effort

In tactical settings, assessment must be efficient and, if under threat, may need to wait until the situation is secure enough to act safely. 


Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

2. Basic Airway Maneuvers

If the airway is obstructed or compromised, begin with manual positioning techniques:

- Head-Tilt/Chin-Lift: For non-trauma patients who are unconscious and without suspected spinal injury.

- Jaw-Thrust: For trauma patients or when spinal injury cannot be ruled out.

- Recovery Position: For semi-conscious patients who can maintain their own airway but may vomit.

These simple maneuvers are often enough to restore airway patency temporarily and can be performed quickly even under fire or during evacuation. 

Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

3. Airway Adjuncts

When manual techniques are insufficient, adjunctive devices can maintain airway patency:

- Nasopharyngeal Airway (NPA): Preferred in tactical and field care. Well tolerated in conscious or semiconscious patients and effective even with facial injuries (unless contraindicated by basilar skull fracture).

- Oropharyngeal Airway (OPA): Used only in unconscious patients without a gag reflex. Easy to insert and effective when bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation is required.

Advanced airways (e.g., supraglottic devices, endotracheal intubation, or surgical cricothyrotomy) may be indicated in prolonged field care or when BVM ventilation fails, but such interventions should align with provider scope and environment. 

4. Clear and Control the Airway

If obstruction is caused by a foreign body, blood, or vomitus, clear it quickly:

- Perform the abdominal thrusts in conscious choking patients.

- Use suction, if available, to remove debris or fluids.

- If foreign-body airway obstruction persists in an unresponsive patient, begin CPR following standard resuscitation protocols.

In tactical contexts, effective airway control often means doing the basics well—not overcomplicating care but ensuring the airway remains open during extraction and evacuation. 

5. Ongoing Monitoring and Reassessment

Airway status can change rapidly. A casualty who was breathing adequately moments ago may deteriorate due to swelling, bleeding, or decreased consciousness. 

Reassess frequently- especially after movement or as the tactical situation changes. 

Key Takeaway for EMS and Tactical Providers

Airway management is the second priority in the MARCH sequence, but it’s equally vital to survival. The tactical provider’s goal is to establish and maintain a patent airway using the simplest effective method appropriate to the situation. 

In many cases, that means manual maneuvers and an NPA—reserving advanced interventions for when time, equipment, and safety allow.

In every case, the principle remains: “Keep it open, keep it simple, keep reassessing.” 

Coming Next: Part Three – Respiration

With bleeding controlled and the airway secured, attention turns to respiration—assessing and managing chest injuries that can silently compromise ventilation and oxygenation. 

Part Three of our MARCH series will explore the recognition and treatment of life-threatening thoracic trauma, including tension pneumothorax and open chest wounds.

When the airway is open but the chest can’t move air, the mission shifts to restoring the breath.

Further Reading:

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. (2022) Advanced Trauma Life Support (10th Ed). Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.

Bledsoe, B. E., Cherry, R. A. & Porter, R. S (2023) Paramedic Care: Principles and Practice (6th Ed) Boston, MA: Pearson Education

Butler, F. K. (2017) Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Beginnings. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 28 (2S): S12-S17. 
Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28284483/ on October 8, 2025

Butler, F. K., Bennett, B., & Wedmore, C. I. (2017) Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Wilderness Medicine: Advancing Trauma Care in Austere Environments. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 35 (2): 391-407. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28411934/ on October 8, 2025

Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (2023) Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Guidelines for Medical Personnel. Defense Health Agency, Joint Trauma System. Retrieved from https://jts.health.mil on October 8. 2025

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2020) TECCTactical Emergency Casualty Care Course Book (2nd Ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2023) Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) Guidelines. NAEMT Education Division

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2025) 
PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support, Military Edition eBook (10th Ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning 

National Safety Council. (2023) Injury Facts: Choking Statistics. Retrieved from https://injuryfacts.nsc.org on October 8, 2025

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Understanding MARCH - A Tactical Approach to Massive Hemorrhage

Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

From the MARCH Mnemonic Series – Tactical Trauma Care for EMS Providers

In prehospital medicine, chaos is a constant. Whether in combat zones, tactical operations, or austere environments, responders need an effective method to prioritize lifesaving interventions. 

The MARCH mnemonic provides that structure. 

Used in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) and increasingly adapted into Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC), MARCH guides providers through the sequence of treating trauma in order of urgency:

M – Massive Hemorrhage

A – Airway

R – Respiration

C – Circulation

H – Hypothermia/Head Injury

Each step addresses a preventable cause of death, beginning with what kills fastest. 

This article - the first in a five-part series - focuses on the first and most critical step: 

M - Massive Hemorrhage.

Massive hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in trauma. Life can be lost in minutes from uncontrolled bleeding, making rapid identification and intervention paramount. 

Clinically, a massive hemorrhage may be defined as the loss of more than 50% of circulating blood volume within three hours, but in the field, it’s simpler: if it looks bad, treat it fast.

Principles of Care

1. Control the Bleed Immediately

Identify and manage life-threatening external bleeding before addressing airway or breathing. In tactical settings, hemorrhage control often occurs under fire or while the threat is active, emphasizing the importance of speed and training.

2. Direct Pressure

Apply firm, targeted pressure directly over the bleeding source using a gloved hand and dressing. Direct pressure remains the most reliable method of hemorrhage control and should be maintained until bleeding stops or another intervention takes effect.

Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

3. Tourniquet Application

If the bleeding is from an extremity and direct pressure fails, apply a commercially approved tourniquet as high and tight as possible, proximal to the wound. Tighten until the bleeding stops and document the time of application. Avoid improvised or untested devices—equipment failure can cost lives.

4. Hemostatic and Pressure Dressings

For junctional or compressible areas (e.g., the groin, axilla, or neck), use a hemostatic dressing and apply continuous firm pressure for at least three minutes or as directed by the manufacturer. Secure with a pressure dressing and reassess frequently.

5. Reassess Constantly

Bleeding control is not a one-and-done task. Reassess interventions after movement, transport, or environmental changes. Tourniquets can loosen, and pressure dressings can shift during casualty movement or extraction.

Key Takeaway for EMS and Tactical Providers

Massive hemorrhage is fast, silent, and deadly - but also the most preventable cause of battlefield and tactical death. 

Responders must adopt a mindset of “Stop the bleed, then everything else.” Consistent training, reliable equipment, and disciplined reassessment make the difference between life and loss in tactical trauma care.

Coming Next: Part Two – Airway

Once life-threatening bleeding is controlled, the next critical step is ensuring the casualty can breathe. 

In Part Two of our MARCH series, we’ll examine airway management in tactical and prehospital settings—covering essential assessment, manual maneuvers, airway adjuncts, and when to escalate to advanced interventions.

Because once the bleeding stops, oxygen is your next priority!


Image retrieved from tccc.org.ua

Further Reading:

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. (2022) Advanced Trauma Life Support (10th Ed). Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.

Bledsoe, B. E., Cherry, R. A. & Porter, R. S (2023) Paramedic Care: Principles and Practice (6th Ed) Boston, MA: Pearson Education

Butler, F. K. (2017) Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Beginnings. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 28 (2S): S12-S17. 
Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28284483/ on October 8, 2025

Butler, F. K., Bennett, B., & Wedmore, C. I. (2017) Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Wilderness Medicine: Advancing Trauma Care in Austere Environments. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 35 (2): 391-407. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28411934/ on October 8, 2025

Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (2023) Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Guidelines for Medical Personnel. Defense Health Agency, Joint Trauma System. Retrieved from https://jts.health.mil on October 8. 2025

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2020) TECCTactical Emergency Casualty Care Course Book (2nd Ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2023) Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) Guidelines. NAEMT Education Division

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2025) 
PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support, Military Edition eBook (10th Ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning

Monday, October 13, 2025

The MARCH Mnemonic - A Framework for Tactical Trauma Care

From the MARCH Mnemonic Series – Tactical Trauma Care for EMS Providers

When seconds count and conditions are unpredictable, the MARCH mnemonic. provides a clear, evidence-based sequence for trauma management in both tactical and civilian emergency settings.

Standing for Massive Hemorrhage, Airway, Respiration, Circulation, and Hypothermia/Head Injury, this structured approach originated in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) and has become a cornerstone of modern prehospital and field medicine. 

From the battlefield to the back roads, MARCH helps rescuers- military medics, EMS providers, law enforcement officers, and trained civilians - prioritize interventions in the order most likely to save lives. 

By following this systematic progression, responders can rapidly identify and treat life-threatening conditions while preventing secondary injury and deterioration during evacuation. 

Each installment in this upcoming series explores one element of MARCH, offering concise guidance, field considerations and key takeaways tailored for EMS and tactical responders: 
  • Part One: Massive Hemorrhage - Stop the bleed, save the life
  • Part Two: Airway - Secure it early, maintain it always
  • Part Three: Respiration - Restore the breath, relieve the pressure
  • Part Four: Circulation - Preserve perfusion, prevent shock
  • Part Five: Hypothermia & Head Injury - Protect the head, protect the brain
Whether in an urban response zone, rural rescue, or austere tactical environment, MARCH isn’t just a checklist - it’s a mindset. It empowers providers to think clearly, act decisively, and deliver lifesaving care under pressure.

Further Reading:

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. (2022) Advanced Trauma Life Support (10th Ed). Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.

Bledsoe, B. E., Cherry, R. A. & Porter, R. S (2023) Paramedic Care: Principles and Practice (6th Ed) Boston, MA: Pearson Education

Butler, F. K. (2017) Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Beginnings. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 28 (2S): S12-S17. 
Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28284483/ on October 8, 2025

Butler, F. K., Bennett, B., & Wedmore, C. I. (2017) Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Wilderness Medicine: Advancing Trauma Care in Austere Environments. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 35 (2): 391-407. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28411934/ on October 8, 2025

Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (2023) Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Guidelines for Medical Personnel. Defense Health Agency, Joint Trauma System. Retrieved from https://jts.health.mil on October 8. 2025

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2020) TECCTactical Emergency Casualty Care Course Book (2nd Ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2023) Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) Guidelines. NAEMT Education Division

National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians NAEMT (2025) 
PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support, Military Edition eBook (10th Ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning

Thursday, October 09, 2025

EMS Discussion - When Scope Meets Survival


Lessons from Kentucky’s Antivenom Case

When the call comes in, seconds matter. EMS Providers are trained to act decisively, but also within the limits of their medical scope.

What happens when those two imperatives collide—when a patient’s survival depends on a treatment that regulations forbid?

That question faced a Kentucky EMS crew this spring, and the outcome has sparked national discussion about scope of practice, ethics, and the realities of prehospital medicine.

The Case: A Mamba Bite and a Tough Decision

In May 2025, Powell County EMS responded to a call involving James Harrison, director of the Kentucky Reptile Zoo, who had been bitten by a Jameson’s Mamba - one of the world’s most venomous snakes.

As paramedics worked the scene, Harrison reportedly told them, “You have to give it, or I die.” The crew had access to antivenom - normally reserved for hospital or wilderness medicine use - and, after consulting with a physician, decided to administer it while awaiting helicopter transport.

That decision likely saved a life. But it also triggered an investigation.

Under Kentucky EMS regulations, only certified wilderness paramedics are authorized to administer antivenom. The Powell County crew did not hold that certification.

Despite acting under medical consultation and in good faith, they were reported to the Kentucky Board of EMS (KBEMS) for operating outside their scope of practice.

Importantly, the EMS providers self-reported their actions - a key factor later cited in their defense.

The Outcome: Case Dismissed, Questions Remain

In late September, the KBEMS Preliminary Inquiry Board reviewed the case and dismissed it, concluding that while the paramedics acted beyond their formal scope, their actions were justified by the unique circumstances and their immediate self-reporting.

Powell County Judge-Executive Eddie Barnes, who also serves as a paramedic and was part of the crew, expressed no regret, saying he take the same action again if faced with a patient in similar distress.

Kentucky State Senator Brandon Smith publicly supported the EMS team, calling for revisions to EMS regulations so that first responders are not punished for taking life-saving action in good faith. 

Understanding the Regulatory Context

Scope of Practice exists to protect patients and providers alike. It defines what interventions each level of EMS certification can safely and legally perform. But scope is not static - it evolves with medical evidence, training, and policy.

In Kentucky, antivenom administration falls outside the standard paramedic scope because it requires specialized training and monitoring, typically found in wilderness EMS or toxicology units. 

Risks include allergic reactions and the need for prolonged observation - conditions not always manageable in the field.

Still, real-world medicine is messy. In rare, life-threatening situations, rigid adherence to scope can feel incompatible with the provider’s duty to act.

This case underscores the challenge: how can systems preserve safety and standardization without punishing good clinical judgment? 

Ethical and Operational Takeaways for EMS Providers

This incident resonates with every provider who’s ever faced a “gray zone” decision. It highlights several practical lessons:

1. Consult Medical Control Early

When possible, contact online medical control before performing an off-protocol intervention. In this case, consultation reportedly occurred with an emergency physician - a critical step that strengthened the crew’s defense.

2. Document Everything

Thoroughly record your assessment, communications, rationale, and the patient’s condition. Accurate documentation can be your strongest protection in post-incident review.

3. Self-Report and Debrief

Transparency matters. The Kentucky team’s decision to self-report demonstrated integrity and professionalism - and likely influenced the case dismissal.

4. Know Your State’s Regulations

EMS scope and authority differ across states. Understand your protocols, but also be aware of how to escalate unusual situations through medical direction or administrative channels.

5. Advocate for Realistic Policy

This case may prompt states to consider “emergency exception” provisions - protocols that recognize provider discretion in extreme, time-sensitive cases where a patient’s life is at stake. 

A Call for Systemic Reflection

For EMS Leaders, Educators, and Policymakers, the Powell County case is not about right or wrong—it’s about readiness.

Do our systems empower providers to save lives when the textbook no longer fits? Are our regulations flexible enough to adapt to low-frequency, high-acuity calls? Do we support providers after they make those tough calls in good faith?

As medicine advances, so must the frameworks that govern it. No protocol can anticipate every scenario—but policies can be written to support critical thinking, consultation, and accountability without punishing courage. 

Conclusion

The dismissal of the Kentucky antivenom case is more than a regulatory footnote—it’s a reflection of what makes EMS unique.

Prehospital medicine operates in uncertainty, in chaos, and often in the seconds between life and death. This case reminds us that clinical judgment, ethical courage, and transparency remain as vital to patient outcomes as any drug or protocol.

Let it also be a reminder that systems must evolve - to ensure that doing the right thing never becomes a career risk.

Sources & References

Kentucky Board of Emergency Medical Services (2024) Scope of Practice Guidelines

LEX18 News. (2025, September 27) Kentucky paramedics cleared of disciplinary action after antivenom administration. Retrieved from https://www.lex18.com

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of EMS (2023) National EMS Scope of Practice Model

WBKO News. (2025, September 25) EMS team under fire for treating man with antivenom after mamba bite. Retrieved from https://www.wbko.com

WKYT News. (2025, September 30) Case dismissed against KY EMS team that gave antivenom. Retrieved from https://www.wkyt.com


Tuesday, October 07, 2025

EMS Discussion - EMS Leadership During A Time Of Outrage


The Challenge

Today’s EMS Leaders face more than operational demands - they must also navigate a world shaped by public outrage, political division, and social media amplification.

Every statement, policy, or silence can be scrutinized, criticized, or misinterpreted. Balancing staff expectations, public trust, and professional neutrality is harder than ever.

Why It Matters

Outrage culture can fracture teams, erode trust, and distract from the mission. In EMS, where teamwork and composure are essential, strong leadership in emotionally charged times is critical for morale, credibility, and community confidence.

Core Leadership Strategies

1. Anchor in Mission and Human Impact
  • Ground decisions in your agency’s purpose: serving patients and protecting the public.
  • Ask: Does this issue directly affect our people, patients, or mission?
  • Avoid performative responses that distract from care delivery or operational priorities.

2. Foster Respectful 
Dialogue
  • Create safe spaces for staff to share views without fear of retaliation.
  • Set clear boundaries (no hate speech, no harassment) but allow for conversation.
  • Model Civility - leaders must demonstrate what respectful disagreement looks like.

3. Engage Employees in Decision-Making
  • Don’t respond impulsively to every trending issue.
  • Use consistent criteria to decide which issues merit an organizational response.
  • Let your workforce have a voice in shaping those priorities.

4. Lead with Consistency and Integrity
  • Match public words with internal actions.
  • Empty statements damage credibility — authenticity builds trust.
  • Ensure policies, behaviors, and culture reflect your stated values.

5. Build New Leadership Skills
  • Today’s leaders need emotional intelligence, ethical clarity, and communication literacy.
  • Equip your leadership teams with training in empathy, listening, and conflict navigation.
  • Recognize that leadership in a polarized era requires as much heart as it does strategy.

6. Protect Leader Well-Being
  • The emotional toll of constant outrage is real.
  • Develop personal coping tools, peer support, and boundaries.
  • “Presilience” - preparing emotionally before the crisis - is as vital as resilience afterward.
In Summary

For EMS leaders and providers, the path forward lies in focusing on purpose, consistency, and humanity. Not every social or political issue requires a public stance; instead, leaders should filter decisions through the organization’s mission and its direct impact on patients and personnel. 

Credibility comes from alignment — when an agency’s actions match its stated values, it builds trust both internally and externally.

Leading through outrage demands emotional intelligence, humility, and courage. It means fostering open, respectful dialogue rather than silencing dissent, and recognizing that empathy and transparency often carry more influence than public declarations. 

Ultimately, in an era of polarization, EMS can stand as a model of professionalism and composure — reminding communities that compassion and service remain the foundation of effective leadership.

This discussion piece is based on “Leading Through Outrage” by Shannon Gollnick, JEMS (Oct 2025).

Source:

Gollnick, S. (2025) Leading Through Outrage: EMS Leadership in an Age of Polarization. Journal of Emergency Medical Services (JEMS).

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

EMS Discussion - Urban Hospital Wait Time vs. Wall Time


Emergency Department (ED) delays are nothing new, but for EMS Providers, “wall time” is a unique challenge.

Unlike a walk-in patient who simply waits for triage, EMS crews remain fully responsible for their patient until the hospital formally accepts care.

This Ambulance Patient Offload Time (APOT) often ties up both crews and ambulances, straining already thin resources.

Studies show that in some systems, wall times regularly exceed one, two, or even three hours.

Beyond frustration, this means fewer available units, longer response times, and increased operational risk.

For EMS providers on the ground, it also raises questions about supply readiness, patient monitoring, and when exactly responsibility transfers to the hospital under EMTALA.

Some regions, like Sacramento County, CA, are experimenting with solutions, such as streamlined protocols that allow paramedics to place stable patients in waiting rooms, expanded surge plans, and telehealth pilots.

Legislation in California (AB-40) now requires standardized APOT reporting, bringing new transparency and accountability to the issue.

For providers, the takeaways are clear:

  • Track your own wall times to build local data.
  • Work collaboratively with ED staff and administrators.
  • Confirm local protocols for patient care responsibilities during wall delays.
  • Be operationally prepared for long waits by keeping supplies stocked and equipment ready.

Wall time isn’t just a hospital problem — it’s a system problem.

By understanding, measuring, and addressing it together, EMS providers can help push for solutions that keep both patients and ambulances moving.

This is a summary of an article written by Bob Elling for the Public Safety Group in August.

Further Reading:

https://www.psglearning.com/blog/psg/2025/08/15/urban-hospital-wait-time-and-wall-time?

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

EMS Discussion - Live Tissue Training (LTT)


Live Tissue Training: An Overview

Live tissue training (LTT) involves using live, anesthetized animals to practice surgical and medical skills. While LTT has historically played a role in medical education- particularly in military trauma training - it is also a highly controversial practice due to ethical concerns surrounding animal welfare.

Arguments For LTT

Realism & Fidelity: LTT provides a level of realism that even high-fidelity simulators struggle to replicate, including the dynamic response of living tissue, active bleeding, and physiological changes.

Psychological Fidelity: The lifelike nature of LTT can evoke a stronger emotional and psychological response in trainees, potentially preparing them more effectively for the stress and urgency of real trauma situations.

Hands-on Experience: LTT offers opportunities to practice complex procedures in a setting that delivers immediate feedback based on the animal’s responses.

Confidence Building: Some research suggests that LTT increases self-efficacy and confidence among participants, particularly those preparing for combat deployments.

Arguments Against LTT

Ethical Concerns: Using live animals in training raises significant ethical questions regarding animal rights and welfare. Critics argue that it is inhumane and causes unnecessary harm.

Availability of Alternatives: Advances in simulation technology—including high-fidelity human patient simulators, cadavers, and realistic part-task trainers—are increasingly capable of replicating many aspects of LTT, often at lower cost and without ethical concerns.

Limited Transferability: Anatomical and physiological differences between animals and humans may reduce the direct applicability of skills learned on animals to human patients.

One-time Use: Animals used in LTT are typically euthanized after training, limiting opportunities for repetitive practice and skill refinement.

Policy and Regulations: The U.S. Department of Defense has implemented policies aimed at reducing and replacing LTT with alternative methods where feasible. Additional legislation has been proposed to further restrict its use.

Current Trends

The use of LTT has declined in many civilian trauma training programs, such as the American College of Surgeons’ Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses.

However, LTT continues to be used by the military for combat casualty care training, particularly for developing complex procedural skills and preparing personnel for the stresses of battlefield trauma.

Ongoing debate and research continue to evaluate the effectiveness of LTT compared with alternative training modalities, with some studies suggesting comparable skill acquisition and proficiency.

There is also a growing push to apply the 3Rs of humane animal use to LTT:  Replacement, Reduction & Refinement, seeking to minimize reliance on animals and improve their welfare when training does occur.

In Conclusion

Live tissue training presents a complex ethical and educational dilemma. While advocates emphasize its realism and benefits for skill development in high-stakes situations, critics highlight the ethical implications and the growing availability of effective alternatives. 

The overall trend suggests a reduced reliance on LTT, particularly in the civilian sector. However, it remains a component of certain specialized training programs, especially in the military, as efforts continue to balance training effectiveness with animal welfare concerns.

Further Reading

American College of Surgeons (ND). Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)® Program. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/education/atls/ Accessed August 13, 2025

Department of Defense Instruction (2019) Use of Animals in DoD Programswww.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/321601p.pdf Accessed August 13, 2025

Liang, J. N., Ciampa, M., Kobylarz, F., Anklowitz, A. J., Barzanji, N. K., Sherman, W., & Faler, B. (2024) Impact of Live Tissue Training on Provider Confidence for Operative Trauma Management. Military Medicine, 190(3–4): e784 - e789. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae403 Accessed August 13

NAEMT (ND) Tactical Combat Casualty Care www.naemt.org/education/trauma-education/naemt-tccc Accessed August 13, 2025

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) A Review of the Department of Defense’s Programs for the Use of Animals in Military Medical Training. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (2025) National Physicians Group Celebrates St. Elizabeth for Replacing Animals in Surgeon Traininghttps://www.pcrm.org Accessed August 12, 2025

Swain, C. S., Cohen, H. M. L., Helgesson, G., Rickard, R. F., & Karlgren, K. (2023) A systematic review of live animal use as a simulation modality (LTT) in the emergency management of trauma. Journal of Surgical Education, 80(9): 1320–1339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.06.018 Accessed Aug 12, 2025


Monday, August 11, 2025

The Life-Saving Evolution of Tourniquet Use: From Battlefield to EMS


The use of tourniquets has transformed trauma care, moving from a once-feared intervention to a cornerstone of life-saving strategies, both on the battlefield and in civilian emergency response.

Navy Captain (Ret.) Dr. Frank Butler, the architect of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC), helped shift the perception of tourniquets in the 1990s.

Earlier trauma care teachings viewed tourniquets as dangerous due to the risk of limb loss. However, research from past conflicts, and practical experience, revealed that failure to control extremity bleeding was a leading cause of preventable death.

With the rise of TCCC in military settings, particularly during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the widespread adoption of tourniquets helped save thousands of lives by controlling life-threatening hemorrhage early.

This success led to updated guidelines emphasizing tourniquet conversion, replacing the tourniquet with other bleeding control methods within two hours to avoid complications when possible.

Despite its military success, civilian EMS was initially slow to adopt tourniquet use. That changed following the Hartford Consensus and the creation of the Stop the Bleed campaign after the Sandy Hook tragedy.

These efforts brought battlefield lessons to the civilian sector, empowering both the public and EMS providers to take swift action in bleeding emergencies.

The key takeaway for EMS providers is clear:

👉 Uncontrolled bleeding is a time-sensitive emergency

👉 Tourniquets, when used correctly, are a safe and essential tool in prehospital care

👉 Every EMS provider should be trained, equipped, and ready to use a tourniquet when needed

For a deeper dive into the history, science, and best practices behind tourniquet use, you can read the full article here: 

The Evolution of Tourniquet Use in Trauma Care by Public Safety Group, 2025

Thursday, June 26, 2025

EMS Health & Welfare - Burnout (Part Two)

In Part One, we explored the definition and root causes of burnout - a chronic state of physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion.

Now, in Part Two, we dive deeper into the unique challenges faced by EMS providers and other frontline healthcare professionals.
These individuals often operate in high-stress, high-stakes environments where long shifts, emotional strain, and cumulative trauma take a heavy toll.
Recognizing the warning signs and proactively addressing burnout isn't just about self-care — it's about preserving our ability to provide lifesaving care to others.

THREE CORE DIMENSIONS OF BURNOUT

Research has consistently identified three dimensions of burnout, particularly in occupational and healthcare settings (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001; Weinberg & Gould, 2019):

1. Emotional Exhaustion

This is the core component of burnout. It refers to feeling emotionally overextended and drained by one’s work. It may manifest in:
  • Persistent fatigue, even after rest
  • Psychosomatic symptoms (e.g., headaches, back pain, gastrointestinal issues)
  • Sleep disturbances
  • Difficulty adapting to daily work demands
Note: While physical symptoms like back pain and fatigue can occur, they are often part of a broader pattern of stress-related somatization and should be presented as such (Maslach et al., 2001; Leiter & Maslach, 2016; Lanzi, 2025).

2. Depersonalization / Cynicism

This is the interpersonal dimension of burnout. Individuals begin to detach emotionally from their work, often developing a cynical or negative attitude toward clients, coworkers, or the organization itself. Symptoms can include:
  • Irritability and frustration
  • Reduced empathy or compassion fatigue
  • Feelings of detachment or “numbing”
  • Loss of motivation or interest in one’s tasks
  • Insomnia, attention difficulties, and increased conflict
This detachment can be a self-protective response to emotional overload (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Maslach et al., 2001; Lanzi, 2025).

3. Reduced Personal Accomplishment / Inefficacy

This dimension involves a decline in one’s sense of effectiveness and competence at work. The person may feel that they are no longer making a meaningful contribution. This can present as:
  • Negative self-appraisal
  • Reduced productivity and confidence
  • Feelings of incompetence, guilt, or worthlessness
  • Decreased coping capacity
  • Increased absenteeism or presenteeism
In severe cases, burnout may be accompanied by depression, social withdrawal, substance misuse, or even suicidal ideation — though these represent co-occurring risks rather than diagnostic criteria of burnout itself (Maslach et al., 2001; Weinberg & Gould, 2019; WHO, 2019).

Conclusion
Burnout is not a sign of weakness - it’s a signal that the system, workload, or support structure needs attention.
For EMS providers and healthcare workers, prioritizing mental health and resilience is vital not only for personal well-being, but for patient safety and long-term career sustainability.
By fostering a culture that values rest, boundaries, peer support, and continued education, we can begin to turn the tide on burnout — one shift, one provider, one department at a time.
Further Reading:
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) The Measurement of Experienced Burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  • Mental Health First Aid Staff (2015) Mental Health First Aid USA (1st Ed.). National Council for Behavioral Health.
  • Lanzi, R. G.(2025) Holistic Health: Bridging Disability and Mental Well Being Promotion Through Community Engagement. ACSM’s Health and Fitness Journal, 29 (2): 48-55
  • Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2016) Understanding The Burnout Experience: Recent Research & Its Implications For Psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
  • Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2019) Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (7th Ed.). Human Kinetics.
  • World Health Organization. (2019) Burnout, An “Occupational Phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/burn-out/en/